I think perhaps we need a parsonage in St. Louis for our President. Seriously, a >$500,000 house for a man with grown children. And in a neighborhood of houses worth half of that. What does that witness? (This is not meant as a specific rebuke just against our past president, but something for us all to consider.) Maybe this is why the church used to provide reasonable housing for their workers, to shield them from such temptation.
clipped from stlouis.blockshopper.com
Former Lutheran synod president lists Sunset Hills 4BD
Rev. Dr. Gerald B. Kieschnick and Terry Lee Kieschnick have listed for sale a four-bedroom, 3.3-bath home at 8847 Gladlea Drive in Sunset Hills for $648,000.
The Kieschnicks paid $549,450 for the property in Sept. 2001. The 5,011-square-foot house was built in 1989 in North of 255. It is located in the Gladlea Cove subdivision. Anne Dunajcik of Keller William Realty is the listing agent for the home.
According to BlockShopper.com, there have been 85 home sales in Sunset Hills during the past 12 months, with a median sales price of $227,5000.
Maybe it witnesses that they are good with managing their money, and that a worker is worth his wages.
I plan to write a more comprehensive post on this soon. But do you really think being good at managing home storing up wealth?
This seems like a low-blow. I’m guessing you know all about Pres. K’s financial status, how he used his home, what kind of investments he and his wife decided to make, and how much they contribute to worthy causes. I think that our Synodical Presidents don’t get paid enough for the kinds of pressures and responsibilites they face. I don’t begrudge anyone a larger home than I have, in face, I’m happy for anyone who can afford it and enjoy it, clergy or not.
Are there personal choices that you and your family make that you would prefer not to have people discuss over the internet?
Matt,
First, please note that I posted this not as a shot aimed solely at Pres. K, but as a matter for all of us to consider. There are plenty of sites for low blow shots on both sides. I strive to not be one.
Secondly, I do not know all of Pres. K’s stewardship choices. And neither does the world who views the article I posted. That is my point. It is not just our overall stewardship that matters, but each choice. All the world will see is that Pres. K has a $648,000 in a neighborhood of home in the $225,000. Also, we must remember that the Pharisee overall stewardship was laudable by any standard, except the one Jesus used, which seemed to be about sacrifice rather than quantity. And finally on this point, one with great power and publicity must adhere to a very strict standard of avoiding appearance of evil. I was taken aback by the picture of Harrison playing banjo with a uber-fancy watch on his wrist as well.
Finally, as far as your implicit absolution of anyone’s decision to buy whatever home and rejoice, I cannot agree with that. We must give witness that we desire a better home in a better land. I am not implicitly against nice home or large homes, but I do think this decision must be made with discernment as well.
And finally there are personal choices I make that I would prefer not to be discussed in public, the sinful ones.
Thanks be to God for his forgiveness and grace.